-What signs of opulence do you see in Louis? court?
-Why do you believe Louis said ?I am the state??
His natural talents were below mediocrity; but he had a mind capable of improvement, of
receiving polish, of assimilating what was best in the minds of others without slavish imitation;
and he profited greatly throughout his life from having associated with the ablest and wittiest
persons, of both sexes, and of various stations. He entered the world (if I may use such an
expression in speaking of a King who had already completed his twenty-third year), at a
fortunate moment, for men of distinction abounded. His Ministers and Generals at this time, with
their successors trained in their schools, are universally acknowledged to have been the ablest in
Europe; for the domestic troubles and foreign wars under which France had suffered ever since
the death of Louis XIII had brought to the front a number of brilliant names, and the Court was
made up of capable and illustrious personages.... Glory was his passion, but he also liked order
and regularity in all things; he was naturally prudent, moderate, and reserved; always master of
his tongue and his emotions. Will it be believed? he was also naturally kind-hearted and just.
God had given him all that was necessary for him to be a good King, perhaps also to be a fairly
great one. All his faults were produced by his surroundings. In his childhood he was so much
neglected that no one dared go near his rooms. He was often heard to speak of those times with
great bitterness; he used to relate how, through the carelessness of his attendants, he was found
one evening in the basin of a fountain in the Palais-Royal gardens....
His Ministers, generals, mistresses, and courtiers soon found out his weak point, namely, his love
of hearing his own praises. There was nothing he liked so much as flattery, or, to put it more
plainly, adulation; the coarser and clumsier it was, the more he relished it. That was the only way
to approach him; if he ever took a liking to a man it was invariably due to some lucky stroke of
flattery in the first instance, and to indefatigable perseverance in the same line afterwards. His
Ministers owed much of their influence to their frequent opportunities for burning incense before
It was this love of praise which made it easy for Louvois to engage him in serious wars, for he
persuaded him that he had greater talents for war than any of his Generals, greater both in design
and in execution, and the Generals themselves encouraged him in this notion, to keep in favour
with him. I mean such Generals as Condé and Turenne; much more, of course, those who came
after them. He took to himself the credit of their successes with admirable complacency, and
honestly believed that he was all his flatterers told him. Hence arose his fondness for reviews,
which he carried so far that his enemies called him, in derision, "the King of reviews"; hence also
his liking for sieges, where he could make a cheap parade of bravery, and exhibit his vigilance,
forethought, and endurance of fatigue; for his robust constitution enabled him to bear fatigue
marvellously; he cared nothing for hunger, heat, cold, or bad weather. He liked also, as he rode
through the lines, to hear people praising his dignified bearing and fine appearance on horseback.
His campaigns were his favourite topic when talking to his mistresses. He talked well, expressed
himself clearly in well-chosen language; and no man could tell a story better. His conversation,
even on the most ordinary subjects, was always marked by a certain natural dignity.
His mind was occupied with small things rather than with great, and he delighted in all sorts of
petty details, such as the dress and drill of his soldiers; and it was just the same with regard to his
building operations, his household, and even his cookery. He always thought he could teach
something of their own craft even to the most skilful professional men; and they, for their part,
used to listen gratefully to lessons which they had long ago learnt by heart. He imagined that all
this showed his indefatigable industry; in reality, it was a great waste of time, and his Ministers
turned it to good account for their own purposes, as soon as they had learnt the art of managing
him; they kept his attention engaged with a mass of details, while they contrived to get their own
way in more important matters.
His vanity, which was perpetually nourished - for even preachers used to praise him to his face
from the pulpit - was the cause of the aggrandisement of his Ministers. He imagined that they
were great only through him, mere mouthpieces through which he expressed his will;
consequently he made no objection when they gradually encroached on the privileges of the
greatest noblemen. He felt that he could at any moment reduce them to their original obscurity;
whereas, in the case of a nobleman, though he could make him feel the weight of his displeasure,
he could not deprive him or his family of the advantages due to his birth. For this reason he made
it a rule never to admit a seigneur to his Councils, to which the Duke de Beauvilliers was the
But for the fear of the devil, which, by God's grace, never forsook him even in his wildest
excesses, he would have caused himself to be worshipped as a deity. He would not have lacked
Life at Versailles
Very early in the reign of Louis XIV the Court was removed from Paris, never to return. The
troubles of the minority had given him a dislike to that city; his enforced and surreptitious flight
from it still rankled in his memory; he did not consider himself safe there, and thought cabals
would be more easily detected if the Court was in the country, where the movements and
temporary absences of any of its members would be more easily noticed.... No doubt that he was
also influenced by the feeling that he would be regarded with greater awe and veneration when
no longer exposed every day to the gaze of the multitude.
His love-affair with Mademoiselle de la Vallière, which at first was covered as far as possible
with a veil of mystery, was the cause of frequent excursions to Versailles. This was at that time at
small country house, built by Louis XIII to avoid the unpleasant necessity, which had sometimes
befallen him, of sleeping at a wretched wayside tavern or in a windmill, when benighted out
hunting in the forest of St. Leger.... The visits of Louis XIV becoming more frequent, he enlarged
the château by degrees till its immense buildings afforded better accommodation for the Court
than was to be found at St. Germain, where most of the courtiers had to put up with
uncomfortable lodgings in the town. The Court was therefore removed to Versailles in 1682, not
long before the Queen's death. The new building contained an infinite number of rooms for
courtiers, and the King liked the grant of these rooms to be regarded as a coveted privilege.
He availed himself of the frequent festivities at Versailles, and his excursions to other places, as a
means of making the courtiers assiduous in their attendance and anxious to please him; for he
nominated beforehand those who were to take part in them, and could thus gratify some and
inflict a snub on others. He was conscious that the substantial favours he had to bestow were not
nearly sufficient to produce a continual effect; he had therefore to invent imaginary ones, and no
one was so clever in devising petty distinctions and preferences which aroused jealousy and
emulation. The visits to Marly later on were very useful to him in this way; also those to Trianon,
where certain ladies, chosen beforehand, were admitted to his table. It was another distinction to
hold his candlestick at his coucher; as soon as he had finished his prayers he used to name the
courtier to whom it was to be handed, always choosing one of the highest rank among those
Not only did he expect all persons of distinction to be in continual attendance at Court, but he
was quick to notice the absence of those of inferior degree; at his lever, his coucher, his meals, in
the gardens of Versailles (the only place where the courtiers in general were allowed to follow
him), he used to cast his eyes to right and left; nothing escaped him, he saw everybody. If any
one habitually living at Court absented himself he insisted on knowing the reason; those who
came there only for flying visits had also to give a satisfactory explanation; any one who seldom
or never appeared there was certain to incur his displeasure. If asked to bestow a favour on such
persons he would reply haughtily: "I do not know him"; of such as rarely presented themselves
he would say, "He is a man I never see"; and from these judgements there was no appeal.
He always took great pains to find out what was going on in public places, in society, in private
houses, even family secrets, and maintained an immense number of spies and tale-bearers. These
were of all sorts; some did not know that their reports were carried to him; others did know it;
there were others, again, who used to write to him directly, through channels which he
prescribed; others who were admitted by the backstairs and saw him in his private room. Many a
man in all ranks of life was ruined by these methods, often very unjustly, without ever being able
to discover the reason; and when the King had once taken a prejudice against a man, he hardly
ever got over it....
No one understood better than Louis XIV the art of enhancing the value of a favour by his
manner of bestowing it; he knew how to make the most of a word, a smile, even of a glance. If
he addressed any one, were it but to ask a trifling question or make some commonplace remark,
all eyes were turned on the person so honored; it was a mark of favour which always gave rise to
He loved splendour, magnificence, and profusion in all things, and encouraged similar tastes in
his Court; to spend money freely on equipages and buildings, on feasting and at cards, was a sure
way to gain his favour, perhaps to obtain the honour of a word from him. Motives of policy had
something to do with this; by making expensive habits the fashion, and, for people in a certain
position, a necessity, he compelled his courtiers to live beyond their income, and gradually
reduced them to depend on his bounty for the means of subsistence. This was a plague which,
once introduced, became a scourge to the whole country, for it did not take long to spread to
Paris, and thence to the armies and the provinces; so that a man of any position is now estimated
entirely according to his expenditure on his table and other luxuries. This folly, sustained by
pride and ostentation, has already produced widespread confusion; it threatens to end in nothing
short of ruin and a general overthrow.
This question was answered on: Oct 15, 2019Buy this answer for only: $15
This attachment is locked
Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card . All your purchases are securely protected by .
About this QuestionSTATUS
Oct 15, 2019EXPERT
YES, THIS IS LEGAL
We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.
You can also use these solutions:
- As a reference for in-depth understanding of the subject.
- As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
- For editing and paraphrasing (check your institution's definition of plagiarism and recommended paraphrase).
NEW ASSIGNMENT HELP?
Order New Solution. Quick Turnaround
Click on the button below in order to Order for a New, Original and High-Quality Essay Solutions. New orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.
WE GUARANTEE, THAT YOUR PAPER WILL BE WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH AND WITHIN A DEADLINE.